For instance, if your dog or your cat gets sick, you may have to see a veterinarian in order to cure that disease. Since those reasons apply to many animals experimented upon, animal testing is also wrong. But Dr. Woodruff, who worked at the E.P.A. The animals themselves gain from it. Msg/data rates may apply. As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. While it may make sense to use animal experiments from time to time since there are simply no other alternatives, those experiments may not be justifiable on a large scale. It would be wrong to test a drug of unknown effect on humans, which is why we test on animals first. For instance, this is especially true for food supplements since they often contain high concentrations of a certain substance, which may be potentially harmful to human health. Even in our current state of the world, there are so many bacteria and viruses around and we know quite little about the majority of them yet. This page titled 8.10: Animal Testing Should Be Banned is shared under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Nathan Nobis ( Open Philosophy Press ) via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the . For many people, none of the animal testing pros beat this animal testing con. Animals used for such safety testing are usually not killed and remain relatively healthy. Hi, I hope you enjoyed reading this article. Thus, in those countries, animal testing may not serve as a valid research method and researchers have to find other testing methods instead. In the end, taking the pros and cons into consideration, animal testing highlights the fine line between ethics and practical need, and the ultimate decision is subjective to the values of each individual. Says It Will Drastically Reduce Animal Testing, Mihir Zaveri, Mariel Padilla and Jaclyn Peiser write about the decision: The E.P.A. One important advantage of animal testing is that we will be better able to understand certain viruses and bacteria once we test their effects on animals. With the existence of such options, shouldnt we abandon animal testing for good? Therefore, if we do not want to be the guinea pig, animal testing might be the only other valid way to go in order to get proper medical research findings. As an associate, I may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon or other programs. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. For these reasons, scientists can confidently apply the results of a panoply of medical experiments on animals to human beings and be more confident when it's time to experiment on humans directly in clinical trials. My name is Andreas and my mission is to educate people of all ages about our environmental problems and how everyone can make a contribution to mitigate these issues. Best Supplement for Joint Pain for Inflammation: Transparent Labs Curcumin C3 Complex. When it comes to the testing of certain drugs or vaccines, there is simply a lack of suitable alternatives. Animal testing involves experimenting on animals to try to determine whether drugs and medical treatments are safe and effective for humans. There are already sufficient safety data and many non-animal methods available to make animal testing obsolete for these products. You can join PETA in opposing these cruel and useless tests by taking action today: Help End Experiments on Animals at Colleges. Thanks to scientific innovation, alternatives to animal testing exist today. 8.9: Abortion and Animal Rights- Does Either Topic Lead to the Other? to move away from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals? Find all our Student Opinion questions here. Every year in the U.S., tens of millions animals suffer and die in chemical, drug, food, and product tests. And no, not a discussion about theories or hypotheses but about ethics. Essay On Why Animal Testing Is Necessary 1130 Words | 5 Pages In 2010, the U.S. Department of Agriculture reported that nearly 100,000 animals suffered pain during experiments while not being administered any anesthesia. With such highly inaccurate results, putting animals through such torture seems wasteful. This is especially true for people who live in the poor part of our planet since they often do not have access to proper medical treatment or simply cannot afford it. These sentient beings arent even defined as animals under this act, which is the only federal law offering any sort of protection for animals. There is no adequate alternative to testing on a living, whole-body system. The unnatural and stressful conditions of captivity make it even more unlikely that the results of animal tests can be applied to humans. Does that make using the car OK? The reverse is also true. This is a cost that may reoccur over the course of several months, even years. The polio vaccine developed for human use only after it was tested on animals has helped reduce this dreaded disease to near-irrelevance. Even when alternatives to the use of animals are available, the law doesnt require that they be usedand often, they arent. In this article, the pros and cons of animal testing are examined. Or do you think animal testing is still necessary to regulate harmful substances that can have adverse effects on humans? In many cases, animal testing may not even deliver any useful results at all. In UK, the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 defined regulated procedures as animal experiments that could potentially cause "pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm". Take a trip through time using PETAs interactive timeline, Without Consent, to learn about almost 200 stories of twisted animal experiments from the past century. Please note that all the information I provide on this website is to my best knowledge. Its now easy to see why animal testing is wrong: it violates basic principles of ethical research: it is maleficent, or harmful to the research subjects; it is not beneficial to them; it is forced on them since they dont consent; and it is unjust in that animals are burdened with problems not their own. However, we might be able to use our current research findings in order to apply them to potential diseases in the future. One famous medical discovery is insulin which was discovered through an experiment in which dogs had their pancreas removed. Theres no other living creature with the nearest human-like anatomic form than animals. Another reason why animal testing needs to be done is that the animals being tested, have similar organs such as the brain, lungs, heart, liver, etc. On the other hand, we have animal activists who feel that testing on animals is unethical. Well, they test the product on animals to ensure that there are no unpleasant surprises for customers. Animal testing is a quite controversial topic. Experimenting on animals is not only cruel but also completely unnecessary and unethical. Here are a few arguments against animal testing that support the thought of banning this activity. On Sept. 10, the Environmental Protection Agency said it would move away from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals, a decision that was hailed by animal rights groups but criticized by environmentalists and researchers who said the practice was necessary to rigorously safeguard human health. PETAs searchable Global Beauty Without Bunnies list makes it easy to find cruelty-free companies that have committed to never testing their cosmetics or household cleaning products on animalshere or abroad. But suppose someone wanted to rob a bank and needed a getaway car: there is no alternative to a car and so it is necessary for the robbery. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. Despite the advantages of animal testing, the enormous weight of the animal testing cons, and the existence of reliable alternatives, theres little reason to allow this practice to continue. Many of the most important medical advances are attributable to human studies. Right now, millions of mice, rats, rabbits, monkeys, cats, dogs, fish, and other animals used in tests are locked inside cages in laboratories across the country. Why? From this time on, I wanted to make a contribution to ensure a livable future for the next generations in every part of our beautiful planet. Our research has shown that using dogs, rats, mice and rabbits to test whether or not a drug will be safe for humans provides statistically little useful insight. Most of the products tested on animals dont even make it to supermarkets. Thus, many people conclude that the cons of animal testing outweigh the pros of this questionable research practice. Hence, animal testing can be quite beneficial to cure and to eradicate diseases. Theyre more efficient and save lives., Kathleen Conlee, the vice president of animal research issues at the Humane Society, said the E.P.A.s move is broad-sweeping and significant., This is the first time a government agency has made such a commitment and timelined its specific goals along the way, Ms. Conlee said. [ 1] [ 2] [ 3] 2. Animal testing has been a staple of research and studies for a long time. Some drugs and products are harmful to animals but beneficial to humans. We take full responsibility for our organization and this web site. As estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the . More than 90% of basic research, most of which involves animals, fails to lead to treatments for humans. Even though there are many advantages of animal research, there are also several problems related to this concept. They dont contribute meaningfully to medical advances, and many are performed simply so that experimenters have something to publish about, offering no promise for curing illnesses. We actively campaign to get animals out of laboratoriesand win. The testing results have also provided benefits for animals as well. Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, refers to procedures performed on living, non-human animals mainly used for researching and testing the effectiveness of medical procedures and products such as cosmetics, drugs, household cleaners, and food additives. Thus, from an ethical perspective, animal testing can be considered to be rather questionable and there are also many activists who claim that we should completely abandon animal research on a global scale due to that. Even if something is necessary and there are no alternatives to doing it to achieve a particular end, that doesnt make doing the action right: the end determines that. One of the leading arguments against animal testing is that it is simply a waste of scientific energy and resources, because the results of tests done on other species often cannot be reliably extrapolated to humans. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. Moreover, some viruses also mutate over time and may change their characteristics. PETAs vivid demonstrations and undercover investigations alert the public to wasteful, cruel, and useless experiments on animals, often ones occurring right under their noses. When you think about the financial burden countries have to bear, it becomes questionable whether animal testing really provides enough benefits. While experiments on animals have been conducted during the course of some important discoveries, this doesnt mean that they were vital to the discovery of human-health treatments or that the same discoveries wouldnt have been made anyway without using animals. Founded and managed by UC Berkeley students, we are an ASUC-sponsored student organization and a student-run DeCal course. It has even brought certain species from the brink of extinction. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'environmental_conscience_com-banner-1','ezslot_4',144,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-environmental_conscience_com-banner-1-0');This has not only been true in the past, but will continue to be true also in the future of humanity. It costs significantly more money to use animals in experiments than alternatives to testing, such as in-vitro testing methods. One important advantage of animal testing is that we will be better able to understand certain viruses and bacteria once we test their effects on animals. 95% of animals used in experiments are not protected by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), which excludes birds, rats and mice bred for research, and cold-blooded animals such as reptiles and most fish. Any discussion of animal testing pros and cons must acknowledge that certain kinds of animal research involve subjecting creatures to what can aptly be described as torture. Many research findings related to animal testing are often also quite ambiguous. Do you support the decision? U.S. law allows for animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged. It helps minimize the chances of adverse human reactions, such as rash, itching, or even death, during human clinical trials. Therefore, also from a religious perspective, animal research can be considered to be quite problematic and may even be illegal in regions where those religions are quite popular. Therefore, animal research can also take away the need to test vaccines on humans in early research stages and can protect us humans from serious potential complications. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'environmental_conscience_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_5',146,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-environmental_conscience_com-large-leaderboard-2-0');Many of our health problems can also be mitigated by using vaccines. It is also a common practice for animals' eyes to be held open with clips for hours, even days, in the course of testing cosmetics products. Every day, mice, rats, cats, dogs, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, birds and primates are used. About 100 million animals take part in research every year. Taking a look at our history can help us to understand what will happen in the future and this is also true in the area of medicine. Really, the question is: why should animal testing be banned? Quite often, before those vaccines will be approved for medical applications on the general public, plenty of trials have to be carried out in order to assure the safety of those vaccines. In fact, researchers often do not care about this aspect at all and it may be rather questionable if we as humans should have the right to treat animals in such a poor manner. Laws like the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki restrict human trials before animal tests are done. It's unethical to sentence 100 million thinking, feeling animals to life in a laboratory cage and intentionally cause them pain, loneliness, and fear. Why Animal Testing Should Be Banned: Key Cons Inhumane Treatment in Animal Experimentation Any conversation about animal analysis's pros and cons ought to admit that creature research topics involve subjecting animals to what could aptly be called torture. Some people may argue that animal testing is cruel and inhumane, but it is actually a very humane process. Text LASH to 73822 to urge OpulenceMD Beauty to stop selling cruel fur lashes! Statistics from the California Biomedical Research Association show that almost every medical breakthrough in the past 100 years results from animal experiments. Pandemics pose a serious risk to humanity since if countries spread across borders, millions of people can die from it. The E.P.A. What Is Animal Testing? Sometimes, theyre subjected to painful procedures that inflict them with burns, wounds, and pain to test. Related Discussions . is making decisions.. Some argue that the benefits to humans justify animal testing. Animal testing has its pros and cons but ultimately is unnecessary now. We are a student group acting independently of the University of California. Human beings live an estimated 70 years.
Hannah Bronfman Necklace,
Dollar Tree Wicker Baskets,
Forward Helix Piercing Benefits,
Articles A